Confidential — Internal Strategy

Competitive Intelligence
Dashboard

Scramble — Infrastructure Governance Runtime for Multi-Country Enterprises. Synthesized from market analysis, competitor deep dives, GTM battlecards, and competitive advantages tracker.

Updated: Feb 19, 2026 Status: v0.7-Alpha Target: EU Financial Services Solo-Built by Founder
Adjacent Market Segments
Scramble sits at the intersection of four high-growth segments. Combined addressable market: ~$24B (2025) growing to ~$70B+ (2030).
Combined 2025
~$24B
Across all 4 segments
Combined 2030
~$70B+
Projected growth
Fastest CAGR
35-51%
AI Agent Governance
Regional EMEA
~28%
Of platform engineering market

Regional Breakdown (Platform Engineering, 2025)

North America
38-45%
$2.2B - $2.6B
EMEA
~28%
~$1.6B • Scramble beachhead
APAC
~22%
~$1.3B • Fastest growing
Rest of World
5-12%
$0.3B - $0.7B
TAM / SAM / SOM
Focused on IDP governance, IaC governance, cost attribution, and agent governance for multi-country enterprises.

2025 Estimates

TAM
~$4.0B
IDP + IaC Gov + FinOps + Agent Gov
SAM
~$1.9B
5K+ employees, multi-country, IaC-mature
SOM (Year 1)
$1.5-6M
Azure-heavy, EU+NA beachhead

2030 Projections

TAM
~$15.7B
3.9x growth from 2025
SAM
~$7.5B
Expanding enterprise adoption
SOM (Year 3)
$25-50M
25-50 enterprise customers

TAM Breakdown by Segment (2025 → 2030)

Segment2025 MarketScramble %TAM 20252030 MarketTAM 2030CAGR
IDP / Platform Engineering$5.8B40%$2.3B$23.9B$9.6B~23%
IaC Management/Governance$1.3B60%$0.8B$5.5B$3.3B~24%
Cloud FinOps$14.5B5%$0.7B$26.9B$1.3B~13%
AI Agent Governance$0.5B30%$0.15B$5.0B$1.5B35-51%
Total~$4.0B~$15.7B
Target Deal Size
$500K–$1.5M
ARR per enterprise
Target Accounts
200–400
Qualifying enterprises in beachhead
Sales Cycle
9–18 mo
Large enterprise first deal
Positioning Quadrant
Governance Depth vs. Developer Experience Breadth. Scramble targets the upper-left: deep governance for enterprise. The upper-right is empty — nobody offers both.
Deep Gov / Narrow DX
Deep Gov / Broad DX
Shallow Gov / Narrow DX
Portals / DX Tools
SCRAMBLE
Deep governance, enterprise-focused
Spacelift • $73.6M
Best IaC policy (OPA 7 points)
Env0 • $42M
IaC automation + cost mgmt
Harness • $614M
15+ modules, pipeline governance
Pulumi • $252M
IaC + IDP + Insights + Neo
Humanitec • ~$30-50M
Platform Orchestrator, K8s-centric
Port • $158M
Developer portal, agentic pivot
Cortex • $112M
Scorecards, eng intelligence
OpsLevel • $20M
Service catalog, fast TTV
Backstage • Spotify-backed
89% OSS market share
Kubiya • $12M
AI DevOps agents
System Init. • $24.2M
Visual infra modeling
Massdriver • $12.5M
Visual IaC provisioning
Developer Experience Breadth →
Governance Depth →
Threat Assessment
12 competitors ranked by threat level to Scramble's positioning.
CompetitorCategoryFundingHeadcountRevenueThreatKey Gap
HarnessAI-Native DevSecOps$614M~1,200-1,600~$250M ARRHIGH3-level hierarchy, no discovery, pipeline-scoped gov
SpaceliftIaC Orchestration$73.6M~130~$15M ARRMED-HIGHSpaces are flat RBAC, no discovery, pipeline-bound
PulumiIaC Platform + AI$252M~135~$48.7MMEDIUMNo org taxonomy, no cost mgmt, code-project-scoped
Env0IaC Automation$42M50-805x growth '25MEDIUMNo discovery, flat org model, OPA-only
PortDeveloper Portal$158M~200300% YoYMEDIUMPortal not governance, no policy engine, no discovery
HumanitecPlatform Orchestrator~$30-50M~65UndisclosedMEDIUMK8s-centric, no multi-country gov, DX-first
BackstageOSS Portal FrameworkSpotify-backedN/A89% OSS shareMEDIUMPortal only, no governance, maintenance burden
CortexDeveloper Portal$112M50-100400% growth '23LOW-MEDScorecards not governance, no infra layer
KubiyaAI DevOps Agents$12M~20UndisclosedLOW-MEDNo infra context, no taxonomy, task-level RBAC
OpsLevelDeveloper Portal~$20M~49UndisclosedLOWK8s-only catalog, no funding since '22
System InitiativeVisual Infra Modeling$24.2M11-50Early stageLOWExperimental, no governance model
MassdriverCloud Operations$12.5M~7UndisclosedLOW7 employees, no enterprise traction
Capability Matrix
Scramble's 5 structural advantages vs. the field. Green = native/strong, Yellow = partial, Red = absent.
CapabilityScrambleHarnessPulumiEnv0SpaceliftHumanitecPortBackstage
5-Level Org TaxonomyNative3-level3-levelFlatSpaces (RBAC)NoneBuild yourselfFlat
Infrastructure DiscoveryX-RayNoManual importNoNoNoNoNo
Dual Policy (JS+OPA)NativeOPA onlyCrossGuardOPA onlyOPA (7 pts)Config-centricNoneNone
Jurisdiction-Aware PolicyNativeNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Cost → Business Structure5-levelTag-basedBy projectBy envBy SpaceNoNoNo
Event Envelope ArchitectureNativeWebhooksNoNoNoNoAutomationsNo
Agent GovernanceFull phaseAI chatbotNeo (prod.)NoNoNoAgentic (early)No
Multi-CloudAzure-onlyMulti150+ provsMulti-IaCMulti-IaCMultiAgnosticPlugin-dep.
Self-Hosted / Air-GappedSaaS onlySelf-managedSelf-hostedHybridAir-gappedSaaSSaaSSelf-hosted
Competitor Funding & Valuations
Billions in funding for portals and DevOps platforms. Nobody is funded specifically for enterprise infrastructure governance. This is the white space.
Key Insight
Hot money flows to developer portals (Port $800M val) and DevOps platforms (Harness $5.5B val). Infrastructure governance is underfunded.
M&A Consolidation
IBM + HashiCorp ($6.4B, Feb 2025)
Alphabet + Wiz ($32B, 2025)
ServiceNow + Moveworks ($2.85B)
Scramble's Position
Pre-funding. Solo-built by founder. Near-zero burn. Consulting revenue bridge. Equivalent R&D value: $35-70M in OSS leverage.
GTM Expansion Strategy
Beachhead in European Financial Services (Azure-heavy), expanding through adjacent verticals to global enterprise.
Beachhead
Year 0–2
$5–15M
Adjacent
Year 2–4
$15–50M
Expansion
Year 4–6
$50–150M
Category Lead
Year 6+
$150M+

Beachhead: EU Financial Services

Regulatory urgencyEU AI Act (Aug 2026), DORA, GDPR
Multi-countryTypically 5–15 EU member states
Azure prevalenceAzure leads in regulated sectors
BudgetIT spend: 7–10% of revenue
Deal size$1M–$3M ARR typical
Beachhead size150–300 qualifying enterprises
3-year capture15–30 accounts = $15–60M ARR

Land-and-Expand Motion

LAND X-Ray Discovery
↓ Creates governance conversation
EXPAND Taxonomy Mapping
↓ Quick win, maps org structure
EXPAND Policy Enforcement
↓ Adds CISO stakeholder
EXPAND Cost Attribution
↓ Adds CFO budget line
FUTURE Agent Governance
↓ Adds CISO & EU AI Act budget

Channel & Partner Strategy

Tier 1 — Highest Priority
Azure-focused SIs: Avanade, Accenture Azure
Big 4 IT Audit: Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG
Microsoft: Azure Partner Program, Marketplace
Tier 2 — Medium Priority
FinOps consultancies: Apptio, CloudZero
GRC platforms: ServiceNow GRC, OneTrust
IaC consultancies: Post-IBM HashiCorp partners
Analyst Relations
Now: Informal briefings (Gartner, Forrester)
Post-customers: Inquiry hours, Hype Cycle
$25M+ ARR: MQ/Wave participation
Pricing & Deal Structure
Flat-fee model is a competitive weapon against per-resource, per-execution, and per-worker pricing.
X-Ray Discovery (Alpha)
€13,800
Unlimited resources, unlimited scans, flat fee
Full Platform (Beta+)
$500K–$1.5M
ARR per enterprise • Governance runtime, taxonomy, policy, cost, events

Competitive Pricing Landscape

CompetitorModelTypical Enterprise PriceGotcha
ScrambleFlat fee$500K–$1.5M ARRMore usage = more value, same cost
HarnessModules + seats + consumption$23K–$41K/yr for 200 devs per moduleCost scales with executions + cloud spend
PulumiPer-resource-hour credits~$32.8K/yr Enterprise50K resources = $109K–$219K/yr
Env0Users + deployments$349/mo Pro (10 users), custom EnterpriseCost scales with deployment count
SpaceliftPer-worker (concurrency)Custom, starts at 5 private workersMore parallel runs = higher cost
PortPer-developer/month~$30–$78/dev/month100 devs @ $78 = $93.6K/yr
Backstage OSSFree (personnel cost)$500K–$2M+/yr in FTEs2–5 FTEs to maintain, 12+ months to prod

Price Anchoring Strategy

In-House IDP Team
$2–3M/yr
"Costs less than one platform engineer"
Backstage Maintenance
$500K–$2M/yr
"OSS is 'free' but costs $500K+ to run"
Unmanaged Infra Waste
5–15%
"10% orphaned on €200K/mo = €240K/yr recovered"
Compliance Audit Failure
$50K–$500K+
"One failed audit > 3 years of Scramble"
Enterprise Buyer Personas
Four personas, four pitches, four hook questions. Match the persona, use the hook verbatim.
CTO / CIO
Pain: Can't tell compliance posture across jurisdictions. Cloud costs growing 30% YoY. Shadow infrastructure everywhere.
"If I asked you right now — how many cloud resources does your French division own, what do they cost, and are they compliant — how long would it take to answer?"
Demo: Run X-Ray on real subscription. Show discovery gap. Drill taxonomy by BL > Country. Show compliance heatmap. Eyes go wide at unmanaged resources + cost by business unit.
VP Platform Engineering
Pain: 60% time on governance busywork. Backstage/TFC Frankenstein stack. Can't standardize without 2-year migration.
"How much time does your platform team spend answering 'who owns this?' and 'is this compliant?' — and how much could be automated if governance understood your org structure?"
Demo: Policy varying by country (one rule, not two). X-Ray auto-discovers into taxonomy. Event envelopes as auto audit trails. VP sees governance busywork disappear.
CISO
Pain: Weeks assembling audit compliance evidence. No governance for AI agents. Unmanaged resources in production.
"When your auditor asks 'show me every infrastructure change in regulated jurisdictions for last quarter, with the policy that approved each' — can you produce that today?"
Demo: Event envelope stream filtered by jurisdiction. Each action with policy eval attached. Agent governance: taxonomy-scoped, kill switches, human approval for production.
CFO
Pain: Can't allocate cloud cost to P&L. Chargeback is a 3-week spreadsheet. Paying for resources nobody uses.
"What does your French payments division spend on cloud this quarter? And how confident are you that includes resources not in any IaC tool?"
Demo: Cost roll-ups BL > Country > Domain. Orphaned resources with monthly cost. "167 unmanaged resources = €43K/month nobody owns."
Competitor Battlecards
Click to expand. Each card includes: their pitch, our pitch, kill questions, and objection handling.
Kill Phrases
Use verbatim in sales conversations. One sentence to reframe the competitive landscape.
vs Pipeline Tools (Env0, Spacelift, Terraform Cloud)
"They govern the 40% of infrastructure that flows through IaC pipelines. We govern the 100%."
vs Developer Portals (Port, Cortex, OpsLevel, Backstage)
"A scorecard is not a policy engine. A catalog is not a governance runtime. A portal is not compliance."
vs Platform Orchestrators (Humanitec)
"They orchestrate deployments. We govern estates."
vs DevOps Platforms (Harness)
"They make deployments fast. We make infrastructure governable."
vs AI Agent Tools (Kubiya, Pulumi Neo)
"They govern what agents do. We govern what agents do it to."
vs "We'll Build It Ourselves"
"You can build a governance runtime for $2-3M/year with 10-25 engineers. Or you can buy one. The math is not close."
vs "We'll Use Tags for Governance"
"Tags require developers to do the right thing. Taxonomy enforces the right thing. Tags are metadata. Taxonomy is structure."
vs "We Don't Need Governance"
"You have resources nobody owns, costs nobody budgeted, and compliance gaps nobody found yet. You need governance. You just haven't been audited yet."
Key Milestones & Traction Targets
From current Alpha through Series A readiness.
Current
Alpha Complete
v0.7 shipped. First enterprise engagement active. Solo-built by founder.
H1 2026
Beta Launch
X-Ray discovery, event envelopes, environment promotion. First paying POCs.
H2 2026
First 3 Paying Customers
$1.5–4.5M ARR target. Reference-ready accounts.
August 2026
EU AI Act Enforcement
High-risk AI system requirements enforceable. Agent governance positioning validated.
H1 2027
Full Phase
Agent governance framework, full event bus, remediation loops.
H2 2027
Series A Readiness
$5–15M ARR. 5–15 enterprise customers. Analyst engagement begun.
2028
Scale Phase
Multi-cloud (AWS, GCP). Self-hosted option. Partner ecosystem.

Key Market Tailwinds

EU AI Act — August 2026
High-risk AI system requirements become mandatory. Converts optional governance into mandatory compliance. Hard regulatory deadline.
IBM/HashiCorp Acquisition — $6.4B
Fractures Terraform ecosystem. Accelerates OpenTofu adoption. Creates governance gap above IaC engines.
Platform Engineering Inflection
80% of large orgs to have platform teams by 2026 (Gartner). Question shifts to "how do we govern at scale?"
AI Agent Proliferation
40%+ of Fortune 500 run autonomous agents. Governance tooling has not kept pace. One firm cut monitoring 30%, hired 3x for AI oversight.
Multi-Cloud Reality
92% of enterprises use multi-cloud. Azure leads in regulated sectors. Most have primary cloud (60-80% spend).
Gaps to Close & Risks
Not everything is an advantage. Acknowledge honestly, position as scope decisions or roadmap items.
GapWho's AheadScramble StatusWhen ClosedFraming
Multi-cloudHarness, PulumiAzure-onlyScale phase (2028)"70%+ of beachhead is Azure-primary"
AI agents in productionHarness AI, Pulumi NeoFull phase plannedH1 2027"We build governance for agents, not agents without governance"
Self-hosted / air-gappedSpacelift, Pulumi, BackstageSaaS onlyScale phase"Is governance need more urgent than hosting requirement?"
CI/CD maturityHarness (since 2017)N/ANever"Not our game. Use Harness for CI/CD, us for governance."
Analyst recognitionHarness (Forrester Leader)Unknown startupPost-Beta + traction"We're building the category they haven't evaluated yet"
Category creationN/ARequires education12-18 months"Lead with X-Ray tangible value; align with CNCF/Gartner"
Enterprise sales cycleN/A9-18 monthsOngoing"X-Ray as low-friction entry. Consulting bridges revenue gap."
Early-stage vendor riskN/APre-fundingWith traction"30-day POC on real infra proves value. Built on proven OSS."

Structural Advantages (No Competitor Has These)

5-Level Taxonomy
BL > Country > Domain > App > Service
X-Ray Discovery
Autonomous cloud scanning
Dual Policy Engine
JS + OPA/Rego, org-aware
Event Envelopes
Typed, versioned, tenant-scoped
Agent Governance
Identity, tiers, kill switch

Code30 • Scramble Competitive Intelligence Dashboard • Confidential • February 2026
Data sourced from analyst reports, press releases, and competitive intelligence. Market projections are directional estimates.